Saturday, October 08, 2005

The Truth About Three Six
2005.10.07 1:19

The three digit number 666 appears in Revelation, and many people know this number means something evil. Recently the number of my comments crossed this number so I thought about the true meaning the number connotes.
The number 666 means 66.666666....often three means just many and endless, so 666 means just the same as 2/3rds.
In our country in order to ammend the Constitution, the national assembly needs to have 2/3rds majority, in other words, 66.666...% , if they've got 2/3rds majority, our peace constitution can be changed, that means it might lead to the path to the war. Of course in order to change the constitution, we need to have over half -majority in referendum, but first natiional assembly has to has 2/3rds of majority, that means 666.
Make sense? 666 leads to the war as anticipated in Revelation. That's what I assume what three digit six means.
List all Journal entries
The Truth About Three Six Preferences Top 3 comments Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold: -1: 3 comments 0: 3 comments 1: 3 comments 2: 2 comments 3: 0 comments 4: 0 comments 5: 0 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads) Save:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
It's a mistranslation(Score:2)
by FidelCatsro (861135) <fidelcatsro@gma i l . com> on 2005.10.07 1:56 (#13731795) (Last Journal: 2005.10.07 22:05)
It was originally 616 ,615 or 115 , which changed sometime in the 5th century i believe . But the early manuscripts had 616 in them .So all the demon worshipers and Worried bible bashers who use the number are actually worried about a false number.Though it is true that 666 has some great mathematical properties .. i don't believe it is a doomsday predictor--Careful not to tread where Vultures dare..A day as a lion beats a life on the lamb [ Reply to This ]
Re:It's a mistranslation(Score:1)
by mercedo (822671) * on 2005.10.07 2:17 (#13732034) (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11854854 Last Journal: 2005.10.08 3:01)
Oh, really? Since many transcripts were not correct from original, this is quite likely. I disappointed though, old texts like Bible are subject to being suffered from these misconceptions.
As to these, there are many Apocrypha other than Authoritative Version, we'd better not too much rely on what we are able to read right now.--Ancient Greek Philosophers -18c Enlightenment Thinkers -Slashdotters [ Reply to This Parent ]
Re:It's a mistranslation(Score:2)
by FidelCatsro (861135) <fidelcatsro@gma i l . com> on 2005.10.07 2:40 (#13732273) (Last Journal: 2005.10.07 22:05)
You can't really trust a 2000+ year old document to be all that accurate . MS has trouble with 6 year old .doc's ;) .I mean how many people think Satan is the devil .. In the original bible there is no mention of Satan being the devil , he is god's prosecuting angel , Hell does not exist till and is merely the absence of god ,Purgatory/limbo were invented as a way to appease mothers who lost a child during birth or something like that well after the 4th century .Yet how many people hold these things as principles of their faith ."Repent before god or accept Satan "--Careful not to tread where Vultures dare..A day as a lion beats a life on the lamb

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home